Search
Close this search box.
Resources

Technical Papers

53. SEAOC Energy Dissipation Committee Appendix A: Guidelines for Buildings Using Passive Energy Dissipation Systems

This set of provisions provides minimum design requirements for the incorporation of passive energy dissipation devices in buildings. Energy dissipation devices (also termed damping devices) reduce global and interstory seismic displacement response of structural systems, but may either increase or decrease seismic stresses and accelerations within structural systems. They provide a controlled increase in structural damping, and may also result in an increase in structural stiffness or change in participating mass. Passive energy dissipation systems do not require active control by electrical, pneumatic or hydraulic systems. Buildings designed in conformance with these provisions must also be designed in accordance with all other applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code, except as specifically defined in this appendix. Design must consider the combined behavior of all elements of both the Lateral Force Resisting System (LFRS) and the Energy Dissipation System (EDS). Energy dissipation devices must not form part of the gravity load - resisting system.

Share This Post

More To Explore

White Paper

21. SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES WITH SUPPLEMENTAL DAMPING

This paper presents a review of supplemental damping devices used for the control of the seismic response of structures. The mechanical properties of these devices are discussed and considerations in the design of energy absorbing systems are presented. Conventional structures passively resist earthquakes through a combination of strength, deformability and energy absorption. They have very little damping, so elastic energy absorption is small. Strong earthquakes deform these structures well beyond their elastic limit through localized plastic hinging, which results in increased flexibility and energy dissipation. Most of the earthquake energy is absorbed by the structure through localized damage of the lateral force resisting system. This is somewhat of a paradox in that the effects of earthquakes (i.e. structural damage) are counteracted by allowing structural damage. Structural performance can be greatly improved if a large portion of the input energy can be absorbed, not by the structure itself, but by some type of supplemental device. This paper describes a number of ways to do this, including friction devices, yielding metal systems, elastomeric viscoelastic dampers and fluid viscous dampers.

Read More »
White Paper

23. SEMI-ACTIVE FLUID VISCOUS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC RESPONSE CONTROL

The addition of passive damping to a structure greatly increases its earthquake resistance. It is possible to get further increase through an active or semi-active control system for the dampers. Semi-active damping is preferred due to low external power requirements and fail-safe operation. This paper describes the history of the successful use of semi-active fluidic control devices in military applications and how this technology has been adapted to earthquake hazard mitigation. Testing of a semi-active continuously adjustable damping device through fluid orificing is described. Mathematical models of the behavior of the device are also presented.

Read More »
White Paper

27. UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO–TAISEI CORPORATION RESEARCH PROJECT ON BRIDGE SEISMIC ISOLATION SYSTEMS

This paper describes the first part of a project to produce a class of passive sliding seismic isolation systems for bridges. This includes experimental verification of the systems by large scale shake table testing, analytical techniques for interpretation of the experimental results, and design procedures for sliding bridge isolation systems. A quarter length scale bridge model was tested on a shake table. Restoring force was provided by various means. First, spherically shaped sliding bearings (known as FPS bearings) were used to provide restoring and frictional forces within a compact unit. Next, flat sliding bearings were combined with various devices placed between the deck and the pier to provide restoring force and additional energy dissipation capacity. These devices were in the form of: a) arc-shaped rubber elements between a moving central rod and a cylindrical housing, b) wire rope springs, c) fluid spring-damper devices and d) fluid viscous dampers.

Read More »
White Paper

29. EXPERIMENTAL AND ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES WITH SUPPLEMENTAL FLUID VISCOUS DAMPERS

This 206 page report presents the results of an extensive study on fluid viscous dampers. A series of component tests with various dynamic inputs was performed to determine the mechanical characteristics and frequency dependencies of the dampers. In addition, temperature dependencies were evaluated by varying the ambient temperature of the damper during component testing. Based on these component tests, a mathematical model was developed to describe the macroscopic behavior of the damper. Earthquake simulation tests were then performed on one story and three story steel structures both with and without dampers. The addition of supplemental dampers significantly reduced the response of the structure for both interstory drift and shear forces. The experimental responses correlated well with analytical predictions.

Read More »

Investor Information

2022 Q1 Important Links

 

Investor Information

2021 Q4 Important Links

Investor Information

2021 Q3 Important Links

Investor Information

2021 Q2 Important Links

Investor Information

2021 Q1 Important Links

Investor Information

2020 Q4 Important Links

Investor Information

2020 Q3 Important Links

Thank You!

A Taylor Devices Representative will be in touch shortly.

Investor Information

2020 Q1 Important Links

Investor Information

2019 Q4 Important Links